Legal Opinion
United States v. Tarleton
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
Decided September 22, 1997No. 96-0430; Crim.App. No. 31209PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
EFFRON, Judge:
In March 1994, appellant was tried by a general court-martial at Hickam Air Force Base, Hawaii. Prior to entering his plea, appellant moved to suppress a confession on the ground that it was involuntary. After *171the military judge denied the motion, appellant entered a conditional guilty plea in order to preserve the issue for appeal. See RCM 910(a)(2), Manual for Courts-Martial, United States (1995 ed.). The military judge accepted the plea and found him guilty of a single specification of using methamphetamine on divers occasions over a period of slightly…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. CookCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1998
- United States v. ToroUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1993
- United States v. HamilUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1964
- United States v. CorraineUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. AkbarCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2015
- United States v. GarciaNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2002
- United States v. KahmannNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2003
- United States v. MonroeUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1999
- United States v. SheltonArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.