Legal Opinion

United States v. Hamil

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided October 23, 1964No. 17,605PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*111Opinion of the Court

Quinn, Chief Judge:

The accused stands convicted of one specification of larceny of an electric razor from a fellow soldier and three specifications of communicating obscene language over the telephone to a female, in violation of Articles 121 and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC §§ 921 and 934, respectively. His sentence, as reduced by the convening authority, includes a dishonorable discharge and confinement at hard labor for two years. On this appeal, the accused contends that evidence of the discovery of the electric razor in his duffle bag was obtained in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. CruzUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1959
  2. United States v. DavisUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1960
  3. United States v. WoodruffUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1960
  4. United States v. ThompsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1959
  5. United States v. SalzanoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1956

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. United States v. EngleUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
  2. United States v. StewartUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1971
  3. United States v. TarletonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
  4. United States v. ThomasU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1991
  5. United States v. CurryU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1983

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API