Legal Opinion

Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. Duke

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 3, 1923No. 4048PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROUROUIN, District Judge.

In a trial to the court, judgment for 525,000 was rendered against plaintiff in error, defendant below, a surety company authorized to do business in Washington, upon its bonds in that amount to reimburse the' bank, a Washington corporation, for pecuniary loss due to dishonesty of the latter’s cashier.

Defendant’s contention that the record is without evidence of any such loss is hardly disputed by plaintiff and is vindicated by inspection. There is evidence tending to show that certain notes found in the bank are valueless, were executed for the cashier’s benefit, and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Scott v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Equitable Surety Co. v. United States Ex Rel. McMillanSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. PoetkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Corey v. StruveCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  5. St. Paul & M. Trust Co. v. LeckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Johnson v. Morley Const. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1938
  2. Duke v. National Surety Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Atlantic Coast Line R. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.District Court, M.D. Georgia · 1943
  4. Clark Car Co. v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1931
  5. Dickenson v. CharlesSupreme Court of Virginia · 1939

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API