Legal Opinion

Lindsey v. Standard Acc. Ins. Co. of Detroit

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 6, 1935No. 7 Div. 327PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

The bill is for discovery and accounting, and prays for general relief.

Demurrers were sustained thereto at the instance of the several defendants.

A court of equity exercises general jurisdiction for an accounting on facts showing a necessity for discovery of matters peculiarly within the knowledge of a respondent, or fiduciary relationship, or such species of fraud or wrongdealing as would authorize that court to take cognizance thereof. Julian v. Woolbert, 202 Ala. 530, 81 So. 32; Comer et al. v. Birmingham News Co., 218 Ala. 360, 118 So. 806; City of Mobile v. McCown Oil…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. CoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Davis v. GraySupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  3. Porter v. SabinSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  4. Hodge v. JoySupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  5. Gableman v. Peoria, Decatur & Evansville Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1900

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Forsyth v. Central Foundry Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1940
  2. Fife v. Pioneer Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  3. Altman v. BarrettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  4. Jarrett v. HagedornSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  5. Walker v. JonesAlabama Court of Appeals · 1947

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API