Lindsey v. Standard Acc. Ins. Co. of Detroit
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Justice.
The bill is for discovery and accounting, and prays for general relief.
Demurrers were sustained thereto at the instance of the several defendants.
A court of equity exercises general jurisdiction for an accounting on facts showing a necessity for discovery of matters peculiarly within the knowledge of a respondent, or fiduciary relationship, or such species of fraud or wrongdealing as would authorize that court to take cognizance thereof. Julian v. Woolbert, 202 Ala. 530, 81 So. 32; Comer et al. v. Birmingham News Co., 218 Ala. 360, 118 So. 806; City of Mobile v. McCown Oil…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. CoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Davis v. GraySupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Porter v. SabinSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Hodge v. JoySupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
- Gableman v. Peoria, Decatur & Evansville Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1900
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Forsyth v. Central Foundry Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1940
- Fife v. Pioneer Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1939
- Altman v. BarrettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
- Jarrett v. HagedornSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
- Walker v. JonesAlabama Court of Appeals · 1947
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.