Legal Opinion
Millar v. Millar
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 14, 1921No. Civ. No. 2220PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
Two appeals involving the same subject matter have been submitted together upon one set of briefs, and they will be considered in one opinion., In one, Joseph Etzel and Forest Lee Atkinson, sureties on an undertaking to stay execution of an order for alimony pendente lite appealed from a judgment rendered against” them in favor of Katherine A. Millar on said undertaking on September 23, 1918. The other is by said Katherine A. Millar from an order of the superior court of November 20, 1918, vacating and setting aside said judgment.
The original action was brought by a wife against her husband…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Gould v. GouldSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Audubon v. ShufeldtSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Sharon v. SharonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- Millar v. MillarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Zappettini v. BucklesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Locke Paddon v. Locke PaddonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Pacific Finance Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Schrader v. NevilleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- County of Los Angeles v. Security First National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- United States Gypsum Co. v. ShafferCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.