Legal Opinion

Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education

District Court, W.D. North Carolina

Decided April 28, 1970No. Civ. 1974, 2631PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRAVEN, Circuit Judge:

This three-judge district court was convened pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2281 et seq. (1964), to consider a single aspect of the above-captioned case: the constitutionality and impact of a state statute, N.C.Gen.Stat. § 115-176.1 (Supp.1969), known as the antibussing law, on this suit brought to desegregate the Charlotte-Mecklenburg school system. We hold a portion of N.C.Gen.Stat. § 115-176.1 unconstitutional because it may interfere with the school board’s performance of its affirmative constitutional duty under the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

I

On…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Brown v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. Brown v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  3. Green v. County School Board of New Kent CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Samuel Bailey v. Joe T. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Swift & Co. v. WickhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. North Carolina State Board of Education v. SwannSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. San Francisco Unified School District v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Robert W. Kelley and Henry C. Maxwell, Jr. v. Metropolitan County Board of Education of Nashville and Davidson County, TennesseeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1970
  4. Evans v. BuchananDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1974
  5. Evans v. BuchananDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1974

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API