Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Evans v. Buchanan

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided July 12, 1974No. Civ. A. 1816-1822Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partGibbons, Circuit Judge

I concur in Judge Layton’s opinion to the extent that it holds:(1) that the State Board of Education is the proper party defendant, and bears primary responsibility for the elimination of segregated schooling;(2) that it is the defendants’ duty to effectuate a transition to a racially nondiscriminatory school system which has eliminated all vestiges of state-imposed segregation;

*1225(3) that the Wilmington Public School System has not been desegregated ;(4) that the State Board defendants must come forward with plans to remedy the existing segregation.

I dissent, however, from the court’s holding…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Brown v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Brown v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  4. Green v. County School Board of New Kent CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Monroe v. Board of Commissioners of JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API