Legal Opinion
Chen-Oster v. Goldman, Sachs & Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 10, 2012No. 10 Civ. 6950 (LBS) (JCF)PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
JAMES C. FRANCIS IV, United States Magistrate Judge.
This case illustrates some of the practical difficulties in implementing three of the principles intended to reduce the burden of discovery generally, and electronic discovery in particular: phasing, sampling, and proportionality. In this putative class action, the plaintiffs allege that their employers, Goldman, Sachs & Co. and The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (collectively, “Goldman Sachs”), engaged in a pattern of gender discrimination against female professional employees in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Watson v. Fort Worth Bank & TrustSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Meacham v. Knolls Atomic Power LaboratorySupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Smith v. Xerox Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Chen-Oster v. Goldman, Sachs & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Chen-Oster v. Goldman, Sachs & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- W Holding Co. v. Chartis InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2013
- Baerga v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2023
- Catherine McKoy, Marcus Frazier and Lynn Chadwick v. The Trump Corporation and Donald J. TrumpDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.