Legal Opinion
Capitol Indemnity Corp. v. Curiale
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 30, 1994No. 92 Civ. 3842 (JES)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SPRIZZO, District Judge.
Plaintiff Capitol Indemnity Corporation (“Capitol”) brings this action against defendants Salvatore Curíale and Stephen Doody (collectively “defendants”) seeking to recover for civil rights violations under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, conversion, negligence and breach of fiduciary duty. Capitol seeks relief against Curíale both individually, and in his capacity as Superintendent of Insurance of the State of New York (the “Superintendent”) as Liquidator of three insolvent New York insurance companies and as Conservator of one insolvent California…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Burford v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Patsy v. Board of Regents of Fla.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Di Loreto v. CostiganDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
- John Street Leasehold, LLC v. Capital Management Resources, L.P.District Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- Foy v. S.M.A. Ins. AgencyDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1996
- Foy v. SMA Ins.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1997
- Foy v. SMA Ins.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1996