Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Di Loreto v. Costigan

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 19, 2009No. Civil Action 08-989, 08-990PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

BUCKWALTER, Senior District Judge.

Presently before this Court are three motions to dismiss filed by: (1) Defendant State of New York Insurance Department (“NYSID”); (2) Defendant Costigan; and (3) Defendants Di Nallo, Peters, and Lorin (“NYSID Defendants”). For the reasons discussed below, Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss are granted.

I. PROCEDURAL AND FACTUAL HISTORY

These filings are the latest salvos in a long-running legal dispute arising from the Insurance Department of New York’s liquidation of Nassau Insurance Company (“Nassau”) in 1984. (Compl. ¶ 32.) Since that time, the…

2Cases cited87 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Mzamane v. WinfreyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
  2. Poskin v. TD Banknorth, N.A.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. In re IezziUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. In re Forever Green Athletic Fields, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
  5. A.C. ex rel. Jerry C. v. Scranton School DistrictDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2016

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API