State v. Kuntz
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilliam A. Bablitch, J.
The State of Wisconsin (State) appeals a decision of the court of appeals which reversed Harold Kuntz's (Kuntz) conviction for arson to a building. The court of appeals concluded that because the jury instructions relieved the State of its burden of proving each element of arson beyond a reasonable doubt, the conviction must be reversed. We con- elude that although the circuit court's instruction created a mandatory conclusive presumption as to an element of the arson charge, the presumption did not play any role in the jury's verdict. Consequently, this case presents the rare situation in…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by88 opinions
- State v. PettitCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1992
- State v. HarveyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. LechnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
- United States v. Stewart BoylesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- State v. SaucedaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.