Legal Opinion
Hayslip v. Textag Co.
District Court, N.D. Georgia
Decided November 6, 1950No. Civ. No. 3325PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law.
ANDREWS, Chief Judge.
An interlocutory decree upon the original complaint in this action was entered by the Court on the 3rd day of August, 1950, in which the Court found that the complainants were the owners of a valid patent upon a laundry identification system, U. S. Patent No. 2,455,007, and that the defendants were infringing upon the patent by manufacturing a laundry identification system known as The Textag System; and in which the Court ordered a permanent injunction “Against the defendants, their agents, servants and anyone acting by or through…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Leman v. Krentler-Arnold Hinge Last Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Wadsworth Electric Mfg. Co. v. Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1934
- Mueller v. CampbellDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1946
3Cited by4 opinions
- Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. United States Plywood Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1965
- Textag Co., Inc. v. HayslipCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1951
- Baltz v. Walgreen Co.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1961
- Homer Clyde Hayslip v. The Taxtag Co., Inc., Homer Clyde Hayslip, Bankrupt v. George J. Long, CreditorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959