Legal Opinion
Wadsworth Electric Mfg. Co. v. Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided June 29, 1934No. 6524PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SIMONS, Circuit Judge.
The cause is for the third time before this court, and involves certain claims of Kries patent, No. 1,224,880, for a fuse and switch box. Under the style Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Company v. Wadsworth Electric Manufacturing Company, 36 F.(2d) 319, we held claims 1, 2, and 10 of the patent valid and infringed, and reversed the District Court’s decree denying the plaintiff below an interlocutory injunction and 'accounting. Thereafter we granted rehearing and took briefs solely npon one question in the ease, and npon sneh rehearing onr original conclusion was…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Permutit Co. v. Graver Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Permutit Co. v. WadhamCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1926
- Field Body Corp. v. Highland Body Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1926
- Richards v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1903
- Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co. v. Wadsworth Electric Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1929
3Cited by28 opinions
- AO Smith Corporation v. Petroleum Iron Works Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1934
- The Schlegel Manufacturing Company v. Usm CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
- Claude Siebring D/B/A Siebring Manufacturing Company, and Owen Siebring v. Charles W. Hansen and Afsco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
- Hartford-Empire Co. v. OBEARNESTER GLASS CO.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
- McCullough Tool Co. v. Well Surveys, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.