Groh v. South
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Allegany County (Heetixeesoet, J.). The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the CourtStockbridge, J.
This is the second suit between the same parties for an injury to the plaintiff’s spring, caused by the backing up of the dammed waters of Antietam Creek. The first suit resulted in a verdict for the plaintiff, and the judgment was affirmed by this Court in 119 Md. 297. The facts are substantially the same in the present as in the former record, and need not be again repeated. In the present suit the plaintiff asks for the damages to which he has been subjected since the time of the rendition of the former judgment, and for exemplary damages, if the jury shall find the continued acts of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Sloan v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1883
- West Chicago Street Railroad v. Morrison, Adams & Allen Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1896
- Corner v. MackintoshCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1878
- Mertens v. MuellerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1913
- Groh v. SouthCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1913
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Turner v. Washington Suburban Sanitary CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1960
- Mayor of Baltimore v. LinthicumCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1936
- Schloss v. SilvermanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1937
- Vancherie v. SiperlyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
- Nichols v. MeyerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1921
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.