Groh v. South
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Washington County (Keedy, J.). The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the CourtPattison, J.
The appeal in this case is from a judgment recovered by the appellee against the appellant in the Circuit Court for Washington County.
The appellee, at the time of the institution of this suit, occupied, and had for years prior thereto occupied, as tenant, a farm bordering on Antietam Creek in said county. On this farm was located a spring; its overflow ran into Antietam Creek. Upon this spring the plaintiff chiefly depended for his supply of water for farm and domestic purposes, including drinking water for his family.
The appellant, at such time, was the owner of a farm bordering upon the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bellinger v. . the New York Central RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1861
- St. Peter v. . DenisonNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Cahill v. EastmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1872
- Wilson v. City of New BedfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
- Lawson v. PriceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1876
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Jones v. MalinowskiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
- Kassama v. MagatCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
- National Credit Union Administration v. First Union Capital Markets Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1999
- Schlossberg v. EpsteinCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1988
- Groh v. SouthCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1913
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.