Legal Opinion

Turner v. Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 18, 1960No. [No. 131, September Term, 1959.]PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHenderson, J.

The appellants, plaintiffs below, brought an action at law seeking damages both compensatory and exemplary for trespass to real estate against the defendants below, O.F.C. Corporation, the Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission, and the individual commissioners, appellees here. The declaration also sought injunctive relief. The court below refused to grant a temporary restraining order, and the case came to trial before a jury, which returned a verdict of $8,730.00 against O.F.C. There was a directed verdict in favor of the other appellees. On motion by the defendant O.F.C., for new trial or…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Dimick v. SchiedtSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Blunt v. LittleU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1822
  3. Neuenschwander v. Washington Suburban Sanitary CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
  4. Spaulding v. CameronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Koenigsberger v. Richmond Silver Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Murphy v. EdmondsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  2. Ellerin v. Fairfax SavingsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  3. Rocks v. BrosiusCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
  4. Bowden v. Caldor, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  5. Green v. Washington Suburban Sanitary CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API