Affett v. Milwaukee & Suburban Transport Corp.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtITallows, J.
In his closing argument to the jury, the plaintiff’s counsel used a blackboard to display and suggest to the jury a mathematical formula for the computation of damages for pain and suffering. Before arguments, the trial court stated it would permit the use of the blackboard for such purpose. Objection was made by counsel for the defendant. At'the close of the plaintiff’s argument the defendant desired to use the blackboard and the plaintiff’s counsel was allowed to take a 'flash-bulb photograph of the blackboard in the presence of the jury. The photograph was not submitted to the jury and it…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Faught Ex Rel. Faught v. WashamSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
- Brown v. SwinefordWisconsin Supreme Court · 1878
- Jones v. HoganWashington Supreme Court · 1960
- Puhl v. Milwaukee Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
- Ratner v. ArringtonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by74 opinions
- Everett v. GoldmanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1978
- Beaulieu v. ElliottAlaska Supreme Court · 1967
- State v. WoodardsOhio Supreme Court · 1966
- People v. LoveCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Caley v. ManickeIllinois Supreme Court · 1962
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.