Legal Opinion
Atlantic Richfield Co. v. American Airlines, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Oklahoma
Decided August 3, 1993No. 89-C-868B, 89-C-869-B and 89-C-859-BPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BRETT, District Judge.
Now before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of the U.S. Magistrate Judge (Docket # 642) filed March 3, 1993, pertaining to the Plaintiffs Motion for Determination of Good Faith Settlement (Docket #259) and the Defendants’ Memorandum Regarding the Proper Settlement Bar Rule (Docket # 270). Defendant Groups I, III and V have objected to the Magistrate’s Report and Recommendation which concludes that the pro tanto credit rule should be applied in this case.
The Plaintiff asks the Court to bar any and all claims by non-settling Defendants against settling…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Edward Hines Lumber Company v. Vulcan Materials Company, Osmose Wood Preserving, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- Edward Hines Lumber Co. v. Vulcan Materials Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1988
- City of New York v. Exxon Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- United States v. Conservation Chemical Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1986
- In Re Acushnet River & New Bedford Harbor: Proceedings Re Alleged PCB PollutionDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1989
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Browning-Ferris Industries of Illinois, Inc. v. Ter MaatDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1998
- Pinal Creek Group v. Newmont Mining Corp.District Court, D. Arizona · 1996
- Pneumo Abex Corp. v. Bessemer & Lake Erie RailroadDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1996
- State of NY v. Solvent Chemical Co., Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 1997
- Sun Co., Inc. (R & M) v. Browning-Ferris, Inc.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.