Legal Opinion
Edward Hines Lumber Co. v. Vulcan Materials Co.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided February 2, 1988No. 85 C 1142PublishedCited by 73 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ASPEN, District Judge:
Edward Hines Lumber Company (“Hines”) brought this action to determine who should be held responsible for the costs of removing contaminants from a wood treatment facility in Mena, Arkansas. In this decision, we address defendants Reilly Tar & Chemical Corp., Bernuth Lembcke Co., Inc., Allied Corp. and Koppers Company, Inc. (collectively “Creosote Defendants”) and Osmose Wood Preserving Co. of America, Inc.’s (“Osmose”) motions to dismiss or, alternatively, for summary judgment. For the following reasons, we grant the motions for summary…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Cannon v. University of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Transamerica Mortgage Advisors, Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- California v. Sierra ClubSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- The State of New York v. Shore Realty Corp. And Donald LeograndeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by73 opinions
- 3550 Stevens Creek Associates, a Limited Partnership v. Barclays Bank of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Edward Hines Lumber Company v. Vulcan Materials Company, Osmose Wood Preserving, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- County Line Investment Company And, Wagco Land Development, Inc. v. Calvin L. TinneyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Amland Properties Corp. v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1989
- Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. United States GypsumDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1989
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.