State of NY v. Solvent Chemical Co., Inc.
District Court, W.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION and ORDER
CURTIN, District Judge.
By motions filed on April 25, 1997, and May 13, 1997, the State of New York (the “State”) seeks approval of a total of six consent decrees (Items 570 and 580). The order sought would resolve this CERCLA action against certain defendants and third-party defendants. However, even if the decrees are approved, many claims by defendant Solvent Chemical Company, Inc. (“Solvent”) against other third-party defendants remain open, as well as Solvent’s motion to file a third-party complaint against additional third-party defendants (Item 549) and its motion for…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- McDermott, Inc. v. AmClydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. Colorado & Eastern Railroad Company, Farmland Industries, Inc., and Maytag Corporation, McKesson Corporation v. Gary W. Flanders Great Northern Transportation Company, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- City of New York v. Exxon Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- In Re Acushnet River & New Bedford Harbor: Proceedings Re Alleged PCB PollutionDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1989
- United States v. Hooker Chemicals & Plastics Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- New York v. SOLVENT CHEMICAL CO., INC.District Court, W.D. New York · 2010
- New York v. Solvent Chemical Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 2003