Legal Opinion

Ford v. State of California

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 4, 1981No. Civ. 5537PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HAMMERBERG, J.*

This appeal1 questions the validity of an order specifically enforcing a settlement reached in a judicially supervised mandatory settlement conference.

Appellant contends that its counsel had no authority to compromise the action and seeks to show that lack of authority by counsel’s affidavit filed more than six months after appellant had knowledge of the unequivocal minute order showing the case settled and a minor’s claim compromised.

We conclude that the order is valid under the circumstances presented for the reasons hereinafter stated.

Statement of Facts2

On December…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Gagnon Co., Inc. v. Nevada Desert InnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Utz v. AureguyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  3. Brown v. NewbyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  4. Mullan v. StateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Gregory v. HamiltonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Waller v. TJD, INC.California Court of Appeal · 1993
  2. Corkland v. BoscoeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  3. Rubin v. Los Angeles Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  4. Gopal v. YoshikawaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  5. Cosenza v. KramerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API