Ford v. State of California
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HAMMERBERG, J.*
This appeal1 questions the validity of an order specifically enforcing a settlement reached in a judicially supervised mandatory settlement conference.
Appellant contends that its counsel had no authority to compromise the action and seeks to show that lack of authority by counsel’s affidavit filed more than six months after appellant had knowledge of the unequivocal minute order showing the case settled and a minor’s claim compromised.
We conclude that the order is valid under the circumstances presented for the reasons hereinafter stated.
Statement of Facts2
On December…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Gagnon Co., Inc. v. Nevada Desert InnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Utz v. AureguyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Brown v. NewbyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Mullan v. StateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Gregory v. HamiltonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Waller v. TJD, INC.California Court of Appeal · 1993
- Corkland v. BoscoeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Rubin v. Los Angeles Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Gopal v. YoshikawaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Cosenza v. KramerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.