Legal Opinion
Donald G. Wexler v. White's Fine Furniture, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided April 19, 2001No. 99-3929PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KRUPANSKY, Circuit Judge.
In this action commenced pursuant to the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq., the plaintiff-appellant, Donald G. Wexler (“Wexler”), has assailed the district court’s *858summary judgment for the defendant-ap-pellee White’s Fine Furniture, Inc. (“White’s”), by which it resolved that the plaintiff had failed to proffer legally sufficient direct or circumstantial evidence to support his prima facie case. Alternatively, the trial court directed that, even assuming arguendo the existence of adequate circumstantial proof buttressing the…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Donald G. Wexler v. White's Fine Furniture, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Richard M. Kadas v. MCI Systemhouse CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- Sims-Eiland v. Detroit Board of EducationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2001
- Pollitt v. Roadway Express, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2002
- Seay v. Tennessee Valley AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2004
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.