Legal Opinion
Seay v. Tennessee Valley Authority
District Court, E.D. Tennessee
Decided March 11, 2004No. 1:00-cr-00168PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
EDGAR, Chief Judge.
The United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit reversed a grant of summary judgment in favor of defendants Tennessee Valley Authority and Craven Crowell (collectively “TVA”) on Counts 67, 75, 125 (with respect to reassignment rights), and 129. The Sixth Circuit remanded these four claims in the plaintiffs amended complaint for further consideration. Seay v. Tennessee Valley Authority, 339 F.3d 454 (6th Cir.2003).
There are two motions before this Court. TVA moves for leave to add two documents to its exhibit list. [Court File No. 127]. The…
2Cases cited67 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Duggan v. Orthopaedic Institute of Ohio, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2005
- Lambright v. Kidney Services of OhioDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2014