Legal Opinion

Bigham v. Winnick

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1939No. Docket No. 47, Calendar No. 40,346PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcAllister, J.

Bussell Woods subdivision in Detroit is subject to the following restriction:

“The sale of intoxicating liquors in any form shall not be permitted on any lot in this subdivision, except that a druggist may sell the same for medicinal purposes in buildings constructed on Livernois road.”

The Bussell Woods Civic Association is composed of owners of real estate in the subdivision and its purpose, among others, is to carry out the enforcement of the restrictions. Plaintiffs include numerous lot owners as well as the association.

In 1932, defendant Ida Winnick leased for a three-year period a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hartwig v. Grace HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Thill v. DannaMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Dolecki v. PerryMichigan Supreme Court · 1936

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Swaggerty v. PetersenOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Shuford v. Asheville Oil CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  3. Edgewood Park Ass'n v. PernarMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Rofe v. RobinsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Boston-Edison Protective Ass'n v. TeahenMichigan Supreme Court · 1953

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API