Legal Opinion

Thill v. Danna

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 1927No. Docket No. 119PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiest, J.

By injunction bill plaintiffs sought to restrain defendants from completing the erection of a building in violation of the State housing code, as amended by Act No. 871, Pub. Acts 1925. Defendants set up authorization by the board of appeals, created by the code, and averred that plaintiffs were guilty of laches. Plaintiffs attack the constitutionality of the provision of the code creating a board of appeals. Plaintiffs appealed from a decree dismissing their bill.

We find no occasion to pass upon the constitutionality of the code relative to a board of appeals. If the code is valid it is of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McKee v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Freeman v. McDonoughMichigan Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Sun Life Assurance Co. of Canada v. AllenMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Smith v. City of Ann ArborMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Stewart v. HuntMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Edgewood Park Ass'n v. PernarMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Bigham v. WinnickMichigan Supreme Court · 1939

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API