Legal Opinion
Rofe v. Robinson
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided April 29, 1983No. Docket 69161PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
On Second Remand
Before: N. J. Kaufman, P.J., and D. E. Holbrook, Jr., and D. F. Walsh, JJ. Per Curiam.
On remand from the Supreme Court, 1 we are to rule on the issues of laches, waiver and interpretation of deed restrictions which were not considered in our previous decisions in this case. 2
I
Laches
Defendants argue that plaintiffs cannot enforce the deed restrictions in question because they neglected to take immediate action to do so, thereby making them guilty of laches.
In determining whether a party is guilty of laches, each case must be determined on its own particular facts. Edgewood Park…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Lothian v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
- Bellarmine Hills Ass'n v. Residential Systems Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1978
- Malcolm v. ShamieMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
- Beverly Island Ass'n v. ZingerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
- De Galan v. BarakMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bloomfield Estates Improvement Ass'n, Inc. v. City of BirminghamMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
- Webb v. SmithMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
- Moore v. City of PontiacMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
- Walter Toebe & Co. v. Receiver of F Yeager Bridge & Culvert Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1986
- Bennington Township v. Maple River Inter-County Drain BoardMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.