Legal Opinion

State v. Jones

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 9, 1992No. 90C-20365 CA A68211PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

842 P.2d 466 (1992)

117 Or. App. 174

STATE of Oregon, Respondent,

v.

David Andrew JONES, Appellant.

90C-20365; CA A68211.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

December 9, 1992.

Jesse Wm. Barton, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, for motion.

Before BUTTLER, P.J., and ROSSMAN and DE MUNIZ, JJ.

2Per curiam

We allow defendant's motion for reconsideration. ORAP 9.15(6). In our original decision, State v. Jones, 113 Or.App. 228, 832 P.2d 459 (1992), we remanded for resentencing on two grounds: that the court had erred in imposing sentence under ORS 137.635 on the basis of State v. Haydon, 113 Or.App. 205, 832 P.2d 457 (1992), and…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. HaydonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  2. State v. HaydonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  3. State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  4. State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. BullockCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  2. Mecham v. HillCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  3. State v. PhaneufCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API