State v. Jones
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Per curiam
We allow defendant’s motion for reconsideration. ORAP 9.15(6). In our original decision, State v. Jones, 113 Or App 228, 832 P2d 459 (1992), we remanded for resentencing on two grounds: that the court had erred in imposing sentence under ORS 137.635 on the basis of State v. Haydon, 113 Or App 205, 832 P2d 457 (1992), and that the court had erred in denying defendant credit for time served. On reconsideration, we withdrew our original opinion and remanded for resentencing on the basis of our decision on reconsideration in State v. Haydon, 116 Or App 347, 842 P2d 410 (1992). Accordingly, on…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. HaydonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- State v. HaydonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992