Legal Opinion

State v. Haydon

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 20, 1992No. 90C-21630; CA A69008PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.

Defendant challenges the sentences imposed after he pled guilty to robbery in the first degree, ORS 164.415, and burglary in the first degree. ORS 164.225. The sentencing court imposed a 12-year determinate sentence on the robbery conviction and a consecutive four-year determinate sentence on the burglary conviction, both ostensibly pursuant to ORS 137.635. We remand for resentencing.

In 1988, by initiative, the voters adopted Ballot Measure 4, which was codified as ORS 137.635 and provides, in part:

“(1) When, in the case of a felony described in subsection (2) of this section, a court…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. TurnerOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  2. State v. SerhienkoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. HaydonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  2. State v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  3. State v. LittleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  4. State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  5. State v. BellekCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API