Legal Opinion

Canadian Reynolds Metals Co. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided December 8, 2004No. Slip Op. 04-155; Court 00-00444PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

POGUE, Judge.

Plaintiff Canadian Reynolds Metals Company (“CRMC” or “Plaintiff’) seeks to invoke the Court’s jurisdiction to challenge the denial of its administrative protest. Plaintiffs protest sought to challenge the imposition of certain Merchandise Processing Fees (“MPF”) on Plaintiffs imports.

Defendant United States Bureau of Customs and Border Protection 1 (“Customs” or “Defendant”) moves for dismissal claiming lack of subject matter jurisdiction because Plaintiff failed to properly and timely file its protest. Because Plaintiffs protest, which objected to three separate actions…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Gould, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
  3. United States Shoe Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
  4. United States v. IslipUnited States Court of International Trade · 1998
  5. Alcan Aluminum Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Thyssenkrupp Steel North America, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2016
  2. Aluminerie Becancour, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API