Aluminerie Becancour, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
POGUE, Judge.
Plaintiff Aluminerie Becancour, Inc. (“Aluminerie” or “Plaintiff’) seeks to invoke the Court’s jurisdiction to challenge the denial of its administrative protest. Plaintiffs protest sought to challenge the imposition of certain Merchandise Processing Fees (“MPF”) on Plaintiffs imports.
Defendant United States Bureau of Customs and Border Protection 1 (“Customs” or “Defendant”) moves to dismiss, claiming lack of subject matter jurisdiction because Plaintiff failed to timely file its protest. Because Plaintiffs protest, which objected to three separate actions by Customs, was…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Gould, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- United States Shoe Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- United States v. IslipUnited States Court of International Trade · 1998
- Alcan Aluminum Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.