Legal Opinion

Foshan Nanhai Jiujiang Quan Li Spring Hardware Factory v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided July 1, 2013No. Slip Op. 13-86; Court 12-00025PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

CARMAN, Judge:

Plaintiffs Foshan Nanhai Jiujiang Quan Li Spring Hardware Factory and Foshan Yongnuo Import & Export Co., Ltd. (collectively, “Plaintiffs” or “the Foshan companies”) are producers of uncovered innerspring units from the People’s Republic of China which are subject to antidumping duties. Plaintiffs requested that the Department of Commerce (“Commerce” or “the government”) conduct a new shipper review under section 751(a)(2)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. § 1675(a), and under 19 C.F.R. § 351.214(c). New Shipper Review Request, Pis.’ App’x Tab…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Corus Staal BV v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
  2. Rhone Poulenc, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1989
  3. Hebei New Donghua Amino Acid Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2005
  4. Tianjin Tiancheng Pharmaceutical Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2005
  5. Windmill International PTE., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2002

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jinxiang Yuanxin Import & Export Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2015
  2. Haixing Jingmei Chem. Prods. Sales Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2018
  3. Haixing Jingmei Chem. Prods. Sales Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2018
  4. Dalian Hualing Wood Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API