Legal Opinion
Tianjin Tiancheng Pharmaceutical Co. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided March 9, 2005No. SLIP OP. 05-29; Court 03-00654PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
POGUE, Judge.
This action requires the Court to review certain determinations in the “new shipper” review of Plaintiffs imports of glycine from the People’s Republic of China. Defendant, the U.S. Department of Commerce (“Commerce”), rescinded its review of Plaintiffs imports after concluding that the sale upon which the review was based was not bona fide. Because the Court finds that Defendant’s conclusions are supported by substantial record evidence, the Court denies Plaintiffs motion and enters judgment for Defendant.
BACKGROUND
Commerce published an antidumping duty order on glycine…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. United States Department of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
- American Silicon Technologies v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2000
- FAG U.K. Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Catfish Farmers of America v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2009
- Hebei New Donghua Amino Acid Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2005
- Borusan Mannesmann Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2015
- Gleason Industrial Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2008
- Foshan Nanhai Jiujiang Quan Li Spring Hardware Factory v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2013
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.