Legal Opinion

Bechtel Corp. v. Local 215, Laborers' International Union

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided November 13, 1975No. 75-245 CivilPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHERIDAN, Chief Judge.

This action arises under the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947, 29 U.S.C.A. § 141 et seq. (the Act). Before the court are defendants’ motions to dismiss and for a more definite statement. For the purposes of the ruling on the motion to dismiss, the court accepts as true all well pleaded facts in the complaint. Bonnot v. Congress of Independent Unions, Local 14, 8 Cir. 1964, 331 F.2d 355; United States Steel Corp. v. UMW, W.D.Pa.1970, 320 F.Supp. 743. For the reasons hereinafter given the motion will be granted in part and denied in part.

Plaintiffs (Bechtel) are…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Jenkins v. McKeithenSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. United Steelworkers v. American Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ed Miniat, Inc. v. Globe Life Insurance Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
  2. Feinman v. Schulman Berlin & DavisDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1988
  3. Pfizer Inc. v. Elan Pharmaceutical Research Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1993
  4. Berk v. Ascott Investment Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Zimmer v. Gruntal & Co., Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API