Legal Opinion

Feinman v. Schulman Berlin & Davis

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided January 11, 1988No. 86 Civ. 7942 (SWK)PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

KRAM, District Judge.

Plaintiffs filed this securities fraud action pursuant to § 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b) and Rule 10b-5, 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5, promulgated thereunder, and state law, including § 352-c of the General Business Law of New York (“Martin Act”). Plaintiffs claim they were defrauded by their participation in a limited partnership. Defendants are lawyers who either advised plaintiffs or prepared documents for plaintiff with regard to the limited partnership.

This action is presently before this Court on defendants’…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Santa Fe Industries, Inc. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Goldman v. BeldenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
  5. Luce v. EdelsteinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. O'BRIEN v. National Property Analysts PartnersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
  2. One-O-One Enterprises, Inc. v. Richard E. CarusoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
  3. Ernest P. Kline v. First Western Government Securities, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
  4. Friedman v. Arizona World Nurseries Ltd. PartnershipDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
  5. In Re AES Corp. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API