State v. Ruff
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
GARY W. LYNCH, Judge.
Terry Wayne Ruff (“Defendant”) appeals his conviction of second-degree child molestation, see section 566.068. 1 Defendant contends that his videotaped confession should not have been admitted into evidence because it was the result of an unlawful seizure and because the waiver of his Miranda 2 rights was not voluntary, knowing, and intelligent. Finding that Defendant’s first claim was not properly preserved for appeal and that his second claim has no merit, we affirm.
Factual and Procedural Background
Taken in the light most favorable to the verdict, State v. Perdue, 317…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Moran v. BurbineSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Berghuis v. ThompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- State v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
- State v. DriverSupreme Court of Missouri · 1995
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. CritesMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
- STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent v. JAMES CARL DUKE IIIMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
- State of Missouri v. Brandon J. NaylorMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016