Legal Opinion

Parkinson v. Parkinson

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1913No. Docket No. 50PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Wayne; Hally, J. Bill by Mary E. Parkinson against Charles A. Parkinson for separate maintenance. From an order overruling a demurrer to the bill of complaint defendant appeals. ■

1Opinion of the CourtKuhn, J.

This is an appeal from an order overruling a demurrer to the petition of complainant filed under the provisions of section 8686, 3 Comp. Laws (4 How. Stat. [2d Ed.] § 11534), which confers upon chancery courts jurisdiction to compel husbands to support their wives under certain circumstances. The facts which led up to thé filing of this petition are substantially as follows: Complainant and the defendant were married September 16, 1877, and lived together as husband and wife until some time in 1900, when it is claimed that the defendant deserted the complainant. In May of 1900 the defendant…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Reed v. ReedMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Campau v. CheneMichigan Supreme Court · 1850
  3. Judson v. JudsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Stone v. StoneMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Eames v. ManleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1899

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Moross v. OakmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Olitkowski v. St. Casimir's Savings & Loan Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Vance v. VanceMichigan Supreme Court · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API