Legal Opinion

Moross v. Oakman

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 1932No. Docket No. 93, Calendar No. 35,903PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFead, J.

Plaintiff filed this bill October 14, 1930, to set aside a deed executed by him to Herman Nagel on November 23, 1909, and a deed from Nagel to Robert Oakman on December 27,1909, on the ground of fraud.

No excuse for delay in bringing suit is stated in the bill except the averment that plaintiff did not have knowledge of the falsity of the representations “.until lately.” Defendants moved to dismiss the •bill as on demurrer on the ground of laches and the failure of the bill to show excuse for the deláy. The court granted the motion.

Plaintiff, contends that, as laches does not depend alone on…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hayes v. Port of SeattleSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. Michigan Insurance v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1863
  3. Campau v. CheneMichigan Supreme Court · 1850
  4. Young v. YoungMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Lockwood v. BeckwithMichigan Supreme Court · 1858

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Lothian v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Newton v. Security National BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Olitkowski v. St. Casimir's Savings & Loan Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Seguin v. MadisonMichigan Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Chesnow v. NadellMichigan Supreme Court · 1951

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API