Legal Opinion

Stone v. Stone

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 14, 1910No. Docket No. 81PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Wayne; Hosmer, J. Bill by Flora H. Stone against Forrist P. Stone for a divorce: On petition of defendant to dismiss the bill for want of prosecution. From a decree for petitioner, complainant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBbooee, J.

Complainant appeals from a decree dismissing her bill of complaint.

The parties were married in the year 1885. Complainant filed a bill of complaint for divorce, upon the ground of nonsupport, on June 21, 1895. Defendant filed his appearance, and on July 1, 1895, an order for alimony and *320solicitor’s fee was made, fixing the alimony, pending the cause, at |5 per week, and the solicitor’s fee at $25. Defendant paid the alimony for 16 weeks, but did not pay the solicitor’s fee. At the time the bill was filed, the parties had one child, a girl, three years of age. This child is now between 18 and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Zoellner v. ZoellnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Reed v. ReedMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  3. McClung v. McClungMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Abe Stein Co. v. WoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1908

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Rybinski v. RybinskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Chipman v. ChipmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Hurt v. CambridgeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  4. Mogk v. StroeckerMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Smith v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1929

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API