Legal Opinion
State v. Smith
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 13, 1988No. 6240PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDupont, C. J.
The defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction, rendered upon his conditional plea of nolo contendere,1 of operating a motor vehicle while *158under the influence of intoxicating liquor in violation of General Statutes § 14-227a.2 The defendant claims that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress the results of breath tests administered at the time of his arrest. We find no error.
Certain facts are pertinent. On December 31, 1986, Officer Adam Stuart of the Old Saybrook police department stopped the defendant after observing him operating his vehicle in an erratic manner.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. RoqueSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- State v. ClementeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
- State v. MaderaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- State v. Chong ChungSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Szarwak v. WardenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Fisher v. City of EuporaMississippi Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. LammeConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
- State v. GardnerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
- Manriquez v. GourleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- State v. RemsburgIdaho Court of Appeals · 1994
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.