Legal Opinion
Manriquez v. Gourley
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 31, 2003No. D039757PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
O’ROURKE, J.
The Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) suspended Jaime Cordova Manriquez’s driver’s license for driving with 0.08 percent or more of alcohol in his blood. (Veh. Code, § 13353.2.) An administrative hearing officer upheld the suspension, determining the arresting officer complied with state regulations requiring a 15-minute period of continuous observation before administering a breath test (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 17, § 1219.3, hereafter regulation 1219.3). The trial court granted Manriquez’s ensuing petition for writ of mandate on the ground the observation criterion was not…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Yamaha Corp. of America v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- Merrill v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Fukuda v. City of AngelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Lake v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- Culligan Water Conditioning of Bellflower, Inc. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
- Burnside v. Kiewit Pacific Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Guzman v. County of MontereyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- Madera Oversight Coalition, Inc. v. County of MaderaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Hoitt v. Department of RehabilitationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.