Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Razy

California Supreme Court

Decided October 8, 1919No. L. A. No. 5251PublishedCited by 9 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. John W. Shenb, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

The defendant James appeals on the judgment-roll from a judgment foreclosing a mortgage. The action was begun by one Arnold Vetter. Before the trial the mortgage was assigned to Anna M. Johnson and she was substituted as plaintiff.

The facts presented by the record are as follows: The defendant Razy, being at the time the owner of the land involved, executed a mortgage thereon to said Vetter to secure a note for one thousand five hundred dollars. Default having been made in payment of the note, Vetter began this action to foreclose the mortgage. The defendant James was made a party upon the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tolman v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Anglo-Californian Bank, Ltd. v. FieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Davis v. RandallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Gethin v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Domarad v. Fisher & Burke, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1969
  2. Kelley v. UpshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Pomona College v. DunnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  4. Bell v. DennisNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Hull-Dobbs Co. of Puerto Rico v. Tribunal Superior de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1959

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API