Davis v. Randall
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Colusa County and from an order denying a new trial. E. A. Bridgeord, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.
In August, 1893, there were pending in the superior court two certain actions, in each of which the appellant here, Davis, and the respondent,' Mary J. Randall, were the main contestants.
One of these actions was brought in the name of E. C. Vancil, to foreclose two certain mortgages upon the premises described in the complaint, one executed October 19, 1883, by the defendant, Nicholas W. Randall, who was then the owner of the premises, to one A. Montgomery to secure a promissory note made by said Randall to said Montgomery for the sum of nine thou*14s ind dollars, with interest, and the other a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Carpentier v. BrenhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
- Rumpp v. GerkensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Brooks v. RiceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Scrivner v. DietzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
3Cited by9 opinions
- Anglo-Californian Bank, Ltd. v. FieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Johnson v. RazyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Cooper v. GobleMontana Supreme Court · 1926
- Carpenter v. Pacific States Savings & Loan Co.California Court of Appeal · 1937
- County of Santa Clara v. EscobarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.