Legal Opinion

Application of Friedrich Gruschwitz and Albert Fritz

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided July 26, 1963No. Patent Appeal 6885Published

1Opinion of the Court

WORLEY, Chief Judge.

All the claims, 10 through 16, in appellants’ application1 for a patent on a “Spray-Plastering-Device for Applying Mortar to Ceilings and Walls of Buildings” were rejected as unpatentable over the single reference, Fritz et al., German, Patent No. 1,013,861, January 23, 1958.

In affirming the examiner’s rejection, the Board of Appeals states:2

This is an appeal from the final rejection of all the claims in the case on the ground that the applicants are barred a patent by reason of the provisions of paragraph (d) of Section 102 of Title 35, United States Code.

The following…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. In Re BoyceCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1944
  2. In re WagenhorstCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1933
  3. Application of Lepage's Incorporated (A Subsidiary of the Papercraft Corporation, and Assignee of Johnson & Johnson)Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
  4. In re WesselmanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1942
  5. Application of Carl Arnold and Heinrich BrandtCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API