Legal Opinion

Hartman v. Oregon State Penitentiary

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 17, 1981No. 06-80-324, CA 18538PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJoseph, P.J.

This matter is before us on a petition for judicial review of an order by which petitioner was adjudged guilty of assault after a disciplinary hearing. He assigns two errors, only one of which requires discussion.

Petitioner contends that the committee failed adequately to substantiate the credibility of confidential informants pursuant to OAR 291-105-041(e). The rule provides that the identity of the informant or the informant’s statement be revealed to the hearings officer and that the hearings officer must have a basis for determining that the informant is reliable.

Although it is unclear…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bartholomew v. ReedDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1979
  2. Geddes v. OREGON STATE PENITENTIARY, COR. DIV.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  3. Grisel v. Oregon State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  4. Allen v. OREGON STATE PENITENTIARY, ETC.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1978

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Shumway v. Oregon State Peniten., Corr. Div.Oregon Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Solar v. Oregon State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  3. Billings v. Oregon State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  4. Naylor v. Oregon State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  5. Reed v. Oregon State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API