Hartman v. Oregon State Penitentiary
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtJoseph, P.J.
This matter is before us on a petition for judicial review of an order by which petitioner was adjudged guilty of assault after a disciplinary hearing. He assigns two errors, only one of which requires discussion.
Petitioner contends that the committee failed adequately to substantiate the credibility of confidential informants pursuant to OAR 291-105-041(e). The rule provides that the identity of the informant or the informant’s statement be revealed to the hearings officer and that the hearings officer must have a basis for determining that the informant is reliable.
Although it is unclear…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bartholomew v. ReedDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1979
- Geddes v. OREGON STATE PENITENTIARY, COR. DIV.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
- Grisel v. Oregon State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
- Allen v. OREGON STATE PENITENTIARY, ETC.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
3Cited by8 opinions
- Shumway v. Oregon State Peniten., Corr. Div.Oregon Supreme Court · 1983
- Solar v. Oregon State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
- Billings v. Oregon State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
- Naylor v. Oregon State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
- Reed v. Oregon State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.