Legal Opinion

Bartholomew v. Reed

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided July 11, 1979No. Civ. 73-438PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JAMES M. BURNS, District Judge:

This is a class action brought on behalf of inmates of Oregon State Correctional Institution (OSCI), Oregon State Penitentiary (OSP), and Oregon Women’s Correctional Center (OWCC), challenging various aspects of the rules of those institutions. The inmates seek declaratory and injunctive relief.

Challenges are made to portions of three groups of regulations:

1) Procedures for Disciplinary Action;

2) Rules of Prohibited Conduct; and

3) Procedures for Administrative Segregation and/or Involuntary Institutional Transfer of Inmates.

In assessing the issues…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Meachum v. FanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Procunier v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Twin City Sportservice, Inc. v. Charles O. Finley & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  2. Helms v. HewittCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
  3. Bartholomew v. WatsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  4. Bartholomew v. WatsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  5. Martino v. CareyDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1983

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API