Legal Opinion

Grisel v. Oregon State Penitentiary

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 11, 1980No. 02-80-169, CA 17178PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*675RICHARDSON, P.J.

Petitioner, an inmate at the Oregon State Penitentiary, was found guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule prohibiting assault. On appeal he contends that the disciplinary committee improperly considered information from a confidential informant.

Inmate Smith was stabbed in the chest. A prison staff member filed a misconduct report alleging petitioner had stabbed Smith. The report stated:

"I received information from an informant (eye witness) whose identity must remain anonymous as disclosure would jeopardize his personal safety and whose information has proven reliable…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Bartholomew v. ReedDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1979

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hartman v. Oregon State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  2. Grisel v. Oregon State PenitentiaryOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Grisel v. Oregon State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  4. Grisel v. Oregon State PenitentiaryOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Grisel v. Oregon State PenitentiaryOregon Supreme Court · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API