Legal Opinion
Allen v. OREGON STATE PENITENTIARY, ETC.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided April 3, 1978No. 06-77-190, CA 9108PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJoseph, J.
Petitioner was found guilty by a prison disciplinary committee of a charge arising under two rules of prohibited conduct: OAR 291-40-050(6) (Destruction of Property) and OAR 291-40-050(14) (Attempt). He assigns three errors which require discussion.
The report of violation of institution rules which caused petitioner to be charged contained this summary:
"A reliable informant told me that Allen had thrown a jar of thinner into cell E-180 where Ferrier 39013 is housed. The informant tells me that Allen was interrupted before he could light the thinner. The informant has given me information in…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Sandlin v. Oregon Women's Correctional CenterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
- Bekins v. OREGON ST. PENITENTIARY, CORR. DIV.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
3Cited by4 opinions
- Varnson v. SatranNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- Hartman v. Oregon State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
- Caron v. Oregon State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- Carpenter v. OREGON STATE PENITENTIARY, ETC.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1979