Legal Opinion

Allen v. OREGON STATE PENITENTIARY, ETC.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 3, 1978No. 06-77-190, CA 9108PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJoseph, J.

Petitioner was found guilty by a prison disciplinary committee of a charge arising under two rules of prohibited conduct: OAR 291-40-050(6) (Destruction of Property) and OAR 291-40-050(14) (Attempt). He assigns three errors which require discussion.

The report of violation of institution rules which caused petitioner to be charged contained this summary:

"A reliable informant told me that Allen had thrown a jar of thinner into cell E-180 where Ferrier 39013 is housed. The informant tells me that Allen was interrupted before he could light the thinner. The informant has given me information in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sandlin v. Oregon Women's Correctional CenterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  2. Bekins v. OREGON ST. PENITENTIARY, CORR. DIV.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1974

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Varnson v. SatranNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Hartman v. Oregon State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  3. Caron v. Oregon State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  4. Carpenter v. OREGON STATE PENITENTIARY, ETC.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API