Fredrics v. Paige
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WOODS (Fred), J.
In this personal injury automobile collision lawsuit, plaintiffs-appellants were awarded a $10,000 verdict. Claiming the award was inadequate they moved for a new trial. The motion was denied. Appellants contend the trial court erred in denying their new trial motion because the jury rendered a quotient verdict, defense counsel committed misconduct during jury voir dire, and defense counsel improperly cross-examined appellant. We find no error and affirm the judgment.
Factual Background
There being no insufficiency of evidence claim the facts may be stated simply. Our…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- In Re Marriage of FlahertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- People v. BarnesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
- Whitfield v. RothCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Horn v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1964
- Weathers v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Kabran v. Sharp Memorial Hosp.California Supreme Court · 2017
- Iwekaogwu v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Whitlock v. FOSTER WHEELER, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Barboni v. TuomiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Brezinger v. Twarowski CA2/2California Court of Appeal · 2014
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.