Legal Opinion

Fredrics v. Paige

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 9, 1994No. B065424PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WOODS (Fred), J.

In this personal injury automobile collision lawsuit, plaintiffs-appellants were awarded a $10,000 verdict. Claiming the award was inadequate they moved for a new trial. The motion was denied. Appellants contend the trial court erred in denying their new trial motion because the jury rendered a quotient verdict, defense counsel committed misconduct during jury voir dire, and defense counsel improperly cross-examined appellant. We find no error and affirm the judgment.

Factual Background

There being no insufficiency of evidence claim the facts may be stated simply. Our…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of FlahertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  2. People v. BarnesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Whitfield v. RothCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Horn v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Weathers v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Kabran v. Sharp Memorial Hosp.California Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Iwekaogwu v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  3. Whitlock v. FOSTER WHEELER, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  4. Barboni v. TuomiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  5. Brezinger v. Twarowski CA2/2California Court of Appeal · 2014

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API