Legal Opinion

Hill v. Merrimac Cattle Company

Montana Supreme Court

Decided August 10, 1984No. 82-390PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Shea

I. GENERAL ORIENTATION AND STATEMENT OF ISSUES

Defendant, Merrimac Cattle Company (Merrimac) appeals and plaintiff, Oscar Hill (Hill) cross-appeals from parts of an order of the state Water Court, sitting in Judith Basin County, deciding the water rights between the parties. On the issues raised by Merrimac, we affirm in part and reverse in part, and remand for further findings and hearings, if necessary. On the issues raised by Hill, we also affirm in part and reverse in part, and remand for further findings and to take additional evidence if necessary.

Hill contends that this Court has no…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wills v. MorrisMontana Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Tague v. John Caplice Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Anderson v. Spear-Morgan Livestock Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1938
  4. State Ex Rel. McKnight v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1941

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Eldorado Coop Canal Co. v. Ben HogMontana Supreme Court · 2016
  2. In Re the Adjudication of the Existing Rights to the Use of All the Water, Both Surface & Underground, Within the Sage Creek Drainage AreaMontana Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Matter of Sage Creek Drainage AreaMontana Supreme Court · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API